NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
After 'coding error' triggers firings, top NIH scientists called back to work (science.org)
jmward01 2 hours ago [-]
The obvious methodology at work here is 'fire everyone then hopefully re-hire only what is blindingly obviously needed'. There are many, many problems with this approach in a business setting but even more from a governmental setting. The first, and what should be obvious to anyone with an ounce of empathy, is that these are real people who's lives are being toyed with. It isn't like you are trying out a new business process. You are literally playing with entire lives here as if they are disposable things. This alone makes what is happening inhumane. Even if it did make things more 'efficient' I would rather a humane government than whatever efficient government they are aiming for here. The second incredibly obvious reason why this is wrong is because this isn't a business. Money isn't the point. Let me repeat this one more time. Money is not the point of a government. I can't understand any argument about government efficiency that only looks at money. It is about total benefit to society, period. If you hire someone that is 'breakeven' in what they produce vs consume from a pure production point of view you could argue that for a business they should go, but from a government point of view you have employed someone and that person is churning the rest of the economy and society has one less drain. In other words all of society is way better off with that breakeven, or even net negative, person employed in government. In other words, an efficient government actually can have what would be considered waste in a corporate world and that is not only OK, but the right answer. I know of several people that are 'employed' but net negatives and society is way better off with that arrangement than having them on the streets. Is there a place for money/efficiency discussions in government? Sure, but if it is the only thing you look at then you really need to re-think things. There are many, many other ways this is morally and economically wrong but those are my top two.
foobarbecue 2 hours ago [-]
I think it's worse than that. Appears to me that the methodology here is intentional sabotage of the government. When your platform is explictly anti-government (also, explictly anti-empathy, and implictly anti-expert), and someone hands you the government, you smash it, along with the lives of all those losers who dedicated themselves to public service.
Freedom2 2 hours ago [-]
Don't forget to say "See! Government doesn't work, we've been right all along!" after you've smashed it.
SlightlyLeftPad 45 minutes ago [-]
Exactly, I’m glad you mentioned it because there are many who can’t see through the smoke. This is the long con but I still struggle to understand the motive there, if for nothing else, is it the simple ideal that government should be small? Why go through all the trouble?
mulmen 1 minutes ago [-]
[delayed]
dkjaudyeqooe 1 hours ago [-]
There's no methodology at work, it's just indiscriminate firings to cull as many people as possible.

This is clear from other other departments where they fired everyone they could.

"Coding error" is just a modern version of "the dog ate my homework". Lame but people will swallow it. They knew what they were doing, they just regret getting caught.

Sadly, once the firings, rehirings, refirings, court cases, and compensations are done, there won't be any money saved at all, probably more wasted.

That public servants do important work under less than ideal circumstances and funding is entirely ignored.

Terr_ 2 hours ago [-]
Also, it's completely destroying an incredibly valuable asset: The reputation of being as stable long-term employer!

Any "savings" today could easily be obliterated by the long-term damage of needing to pay +X% more for equally-qualified applicants for the next few decades.

vintermann 5 minutes ago [-]
If a corporation did this, we'd rightly accuse them of pumping their quarterly numbers at the expense of long-term viability.
strogonoff 34 minutes ago [-]
A slightly less obvious problem with trimming fat is that an amount of fat within any system is good to have if you think long-term.

1. Fat is useful leeway. In critical times, it can be trimmed without otherwise disrupting the operation. Once you have eliminated fat during the good times, you can’t do it in the bad times.

2. A lean system without any fat by definition is tailored to just the current situation. It has much fewer degrees of freedom and is harder to steer to a new course if necessary.

sollewitt 2 hours ago [-]
A beloved Terry Pratchett character defines evil as when you treat people like things.
vintermann 1 minutes ago [-]
Sounds also a lot like the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative.
icameron 28 minutes ago [-]
Jackie Treehorn treats object like women, man!
6 minutes ago [-]
m463 1 hours ago [-]
so, anthropomorphism to be safe?
euroderf 2 hours ago [-]
Well then, that's pretty much an indictment of capitalism.
daedrdev 51 seconds ago [-]
This is an indictment if bad leaders and politics, which also happens under other economic systems as we have clearly seen
croes 2 hours ago [-]
Staff department vs Human Resources
lostlogin 2 hours ago [-]
> an indictment of capitalism.

Capitalism is the least bad system we have tried.

yoyohello13 1 hours ago [-]
Therefore we should never talk bad about it or look in to alternatives.
otherme123 1 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
makeitdouble 36 minutes ago [-]
Who is "we" ? How many systems has "we" actually experienced first hand, and were the results such as you report them ?
mrkstu 2 hours ago [-]
Communism doesn't fare any better under that rubric. Any unbridled 'ism' taken to its extreme tends to fail most human centered tests.
croisillon 52 minutes ago [-]
Like athletism for example?
cyberax 33 minutes ago [-]
Absolutely. See: doping, steroids.
dehrmann 2 hours ago [-]
The other issue is if you try to bring someone back who doesn't need the job, they have extraordinary leverage in negotiating their new contract.
somenameforme 1 hours ago [-]
The article's headline and body are out of sync. They were never fired. They were put on paid leave for less than 24 hours and then told to come back to work because a mistake had been made. Oddly enough even the reason is also stated in the article, and it wasn't a coding error per se: "A presentation seen by Science said the overall NIH RIF was based on administrative codes and that some “may not have been intentional.”"

So the other part of the headline is also misleading. The editor obviously knew "coding error" would be interpreted as a programming error, but it's a "coding error" as some incorrect administrative codes were chosen for dismissal.

jmholla 38 minutes ago [-]
Your comment is incomplete as well. They were put on leave ahead of their scheduled termination.

> The researchers, who were all placed on leave with pay until their future official dismissal date, were told a “computer error” or “coding error” led to their accidental terminations.

rukuu001 1 hours ago [-]
I think your second point is the most revealing: government can’t get away with externalising the costs of unemployment the way a private company can.
dyauspitr 1 hours ago [-]
This is not what they are doing either. If you look at the overall “savings” so far, it’s actually negligible. This is a front for an ideological purge only and that’s the entirety of what they are doing.
sagarpatil 1 hours ago [-]
Rightly said. The Trump administration’s focus seems to be more on saving/making money and less about the overall effects on the people who are getting affected by it.
_DeadFred_ 2 hours ago [-]
The cruelty to 'the bureaucratic class' is part of the point. The Trump admin has clearly stated so over and over both before and after the election:

Russell Vought, Trump’s pick for the director of the Office of Management and Budget (a job he held during Trump’s first term), has said: “We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work, because they are increasingly viewed as the villains.” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/11/books/review/administrati...

BLKNSLVR 1 hours ago [-]
Such cruelty from the top of any organisation is a sign of impending failure. Leading by that example will only retain the vultures, who will pick the carcass of the best parts then move on. Let the ants and dung beetles deal with the shit parts once we're done.

It's going to get worse before it gets better, and I hope the majority of the "worse" will remain contained in the US. The rest of the world is still going to get some in it's mouth though.

mulmen 13 minutes ago [-]
I largely agree with your take here but it still seems to assume that government spending is wasteful. From what I can see government spending is actually pretty efficient and held to a very high standard of accountability.

On the other hand corporate America has a terrible track record. We have Boeing and GM who exist only because the government keeps bailing them out to prevent economic ruin. Look me in the eye and tell me Sears was an efficient operation.

How many of us look at our cloud spend and think to ourselves “I’m certain we haven’t wasted a penny.”

Look at all the VC money that was lit on fire to do food delivery and taxi dispatch. It works now but I can’t say that was financially efficient and it still isn’t affordable. DoorDash provides worse service for more money than a teenager with a used Corolla left to their own devices.

Waste is everywhere but I’m really not convinced the government is the worst or even particularly bad.

AtlasBarfed 1 hours ago [-]
Morals? Ethics?

It's illegal. Any judiciary statement is ignored and unenforced. Trump will blanket pardon anyone anytime he wants to do so. Besides violating centuries of precedent and well-established policy from the age of the spoils system.

The only small solace is watching the conservatives get owned by Trump's tariffs. I'm sure they'll make the best of it (fundamentally it is a consumption tax and highly regressive and probably is just regulatory moat once exemptions are bribed out of Trump).

thakoppno 38 minutes ago [-]
> It is about total benefit to society, period.

What should we spend the next dollar on to achieve this goal?

stikit 2 hours ago [-]
it works both ways. People quit without any notice all the time, and you can be fired for no reason and without notice. It’s not inhumane, it’s life. Your employer doesn’t owe you a job for life, and you don’t commit to your job for life.
eggnet 2 hours ago [-]
But we aren’t talking about firing one person. There are macro effects to firing people at this scale and shutting down whole departments. Not to mention the fact that it is illegal.
kergonath 37 minutes ago [-]
> you can be fired for no reason and without notice. It’s not inhumane, it’s life

It’s life in the same way as occasionally people get hurt, so it’s ok to hurt them on purpose. So no, it is not humane.

croes 2 hours ago [-]
But the government owns the public working agencies.

If you fire people who are necessary you didn’t do your job as a employee.

apical_dendrite 1 hours ago [-]
I have trouble believing that someone at the level of a PI at NIH would just quit with no notice (unless there was some kind of misconduct and they decided to leave rather than get fired). They are running a lab. They direct all the projects that the lab is doing and they are ultimately responsible for all the grant funding. A PI quitting without notice would be incredibly disruptive to everyone else in the lab. I'm not sure how it works with NIH intramural research, but at a university or a hospital you'd have to figure out how to transfer any grants, what to do with equipment paid for by the grants, and what will happen to the grad students, postdocs, and everyone else in the lab. It would be incredibly irresponsible to leave suddenly without addressing those things.
shadowgovt 1 hours ago [-]
While not owed a job for life, the arrangement of government as stable employer was a beneficial arrangement for the public: it let the government hold onto employees they might have otherwise had to pay more for their skillset because "If you're competent we won't fire you; our pockets are infinitely deep and we don't need to save money" was a perk.

Take that perk away, and now they have to compete on other things to find similarly-competent staff. Things like salary. Paid by your taxes.

mr_mitm 19 minutes ago [-]
That's actually not life in a lot of countries that aren't the United States. It's not a law of nature that you can be fired for no reason and no notice. We as a society make these laws.
hiddencost 2 hours ago [-]
Spoken like someone who hasn't yet discovered how expendable they are. Government should work for us, and reasonable quality of life should be a given.
38 minutes ago [-]
tasty_freeze 4 hours ago [-]
In general it is a good practice to assume other parties are making a good faith effort, but after so many obvious cockups, that grace has been exhausted.

My assumption is that there is a lot of blow-back so they are restoring a few high profile names so they can say, "see, we aren't stopping science!". It is good this handful of people are back on the job, but I assume the NIH is like most other organizations -- the top name isn't doing the work themselves. They lead a team of people and their expertise is used to provide them direction and as a resource to help analyze surprising results. If the top experts lose their staff, I doubt they'll get nearly as much done. Having the 65 year old braintrust spending hours pipetting and staining samples is wildly inefficient. DOGI.

mlinhares 4 hours ago [-]
Also, if you're nearing retirement and you look at this mess, you're not coming back, there won't be anything to be done.

Its a trap. They'll get these folks back, there will be nobody else to do the work and they'll come back and say "see, these people were useless, we were right in firing them".

the_snooze 3 hours ago [-]
>Its a trap.

Trust is efficient. Lack of trust is inefficient. If someone untrustworthy like Musk fired me and suddenly wanted a do-over, I'd counter with a completely selfish arrangement like a $500/hr contracting rate with some non-trivial amount due up front.

tombert 2 hours ago [-]
Tangential, but I almost never get to tell this story.

In 2012 I was fired from a job (on my birthday!). I hated this job, I hated my coworkers, I really hated my manager, I was pretty sure that the higher-ups were alcoholics since they always smelled like beer or whiskey, and the work was mind-numbing where quite literally 3/4 of my work was designing nametags even though I was ostensibly a "Java developer".

Anyway, I got fired, and while getting fired always sucks, I was a little relieved that I didn't have to show up anymore.

The following Monday, I got a phone call from my manager demanding that I provide the password to unlock the Macbook that they had me using. I explained to him that I think it's a bad idea to share my password with people that I don't trust. He then told me that I "had" to provide it, to which I said "I really don't think I do, actually. I don't work for <company name> anymore. What are you going to do, fire me?"

This went back and forth for another thirty seconds, and eventually I said "Here's what we'll do, I'll drive over there, unlock the laptop, and drive back home, and you pay for my entire trip. I charge $200/hour."

He was clearly pissed off, eventually hung up, and I never heard back from them. A part of me likes to think that maybe they had to trash the laptop because they were too incompetent to figure out how to wipe the drive.

anonzzzies 3 hours ago [-]
Yep, exactly. I do that over far less. And otherwise, f off. People are way too nice to people screwing you over. Unlike we often see here, there are really good business owners who would (and do) sell all they have to keep all the staff through rough times. But those usually are (all I guess?) small businesses; I have the good fortune to contract (yes they even bend over backwards, both unconnected company owners, to keep their contractors) with 2 of them. And they pay well above market in the EU; American wages while they are from the EU. Most others will try to screw you and they call it 'it is not personal, it's just business'; while that's true, it rings hollow when you just did your stinking best. We are led to believe (mostly because of US tech in my case), that you need to work yourself to death while accepting everyone will throw you in a meat grinder whenever they wake up on the wrong side. Musk as poster child of this. But you make money! Sure, so especially for those, and especially in a pickle, our hourlies are bizarrely high and they still come back.
cyanydeez 3 hours ago [-]
The entire republican party setup a self-fullfilling prophecy of distrust, deep state, etc etc.
theteapot 3 hours ago [-]
Who's they? The Department of Health and Human Services?
tasty_freeze 2 hours ago [-]
There are proximate causes and there are the real causes. Yes, HHS let them go, but the reality is DOGE told HHS to cut them.
theteapot 2 hours ago [-]
The article states:

> "It’s unclear to what extent the employee lists used in the RIFs were influenced by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) .."

timewizard 2 hours ago [-]
DOGE has embedded itself into every federal cabinet department. They've got the gumroad guy poking around in the VA right now.
smt88 3 hours ago [-]
> In general it is a good practice to assume other parties are making a good faith effort

This has never been true for this administration, which A) already had a previous term to show us how incompetent its leaders are, and B) is working from a decades-old playbook of making government more dysfunctional so that people lose faith in it and want to eliminate it.

vkou 2 hours ago [-]
It's quite possible that the playbook they are looking at is more similar to C) starting a fire in the reichstag...
AIPedant 2 hours ago [-]
[dead]
barbarr 4 hours ago [-]
Is there any proof that they're coding errors? A simpler explanation, to me at least, is that they first blanket fired people by dubious criteria, and are now using this as an excuse to backpedal when they realize they've cut something important.
margalabargala 3 hours ago [-]
Software doesn't fire people, people fire people.

"Coding error" could mean anywhere from "we wrote an actual good-faith attempt to measure some sort of performance, there was a bug, and we blindly followed what it said without double checking" to "the code we wrote to 'select * from employees' when firing people was in 'error' in hindsight because we now wish to have some of those people working for us again".

No matter how you cut it, in the absolute best case scenario, the people doing the firing were so incompetent that no one can tell they weren't being malicious.

The median scenario, they were simply being malicious.

sudoshred 3 hours ago [-]
Non partisan take, in every circumstance coding errors are a euphemism for “leadership is humiliated by the outcome and wants to shirk responsibility”.
Terr_ 38 minutes ago [-]
Unless perhaps they can furnish a really good post-mortem on the bug. Which is unlikely here.
BLKNSLVR 3 hours ago [-]
It's either an actual 'coding error' because DOGE doesn't actually understand WTF they're doing or it's what you're suggesting.

So it's Incompetence or Malice. Pick your poison.

furyofantares 2 hours ago [-]
It's 2025. Never attribute to incompetence or malice that which can adequately be explained by both.
Terr_ 22 minutes ago [-]
At this point the onus is on them for pleading their offenses as just incompetence or just malice.
22 minutes ago [-]
2muchcoffeeman 2 hours ago [-]
Both scenarios are incompetence and malice.

They are in charge of making cuts but never bothered to understand what the departments do, the value, or where the excesses are. Yet they still make the cuts.

burgerrito 2 hours ago [-]
I sometimes wonder those people are evil or just incompetent, but it feels like those two are indistinguishable.
DLoupe 2 hours ago [-]
Its's Evil (Evil = Incompetence + Power)
_DeadFred_ 2 hours ago [-]
The Trump admin has stated over and over it is malice.

Russell Vought, Trump’s pick for the director of the Office of Management and Budget (a job he held during Trump’s first term), has said: “We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work, because they are increasingly viewed as the villains.” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/11/books/review/administrati...

BLKNSLVR 1 hours ago [-]
The Boys coming true, in banal form.
Jtsummers 3 hours ago [-]
DOGE did take DOD's AutoRIF which was meant to assist with RIF calculations and modify it. It was also required to be reviewed by a human before initiating any actual separations with it, though DOGE probably went the efficient route and did a "lgtm" rubber stamp on it without looking. However it was just meant to do calculations based on RIF requirement (years in service, veterans preference stuff, and the like) not make any unsupervised decisions based on it.
somenameforme 3 hours ago [-]
The article somewhat buries the facts but a couple of important ones:

- They were able to get them reinstated within 24 hours.

- A presentation seen by Science said the overall NIH RIF (reduction in force) was based on administrative codes and that some “may not have been intentional.”

garyfirestorm 3 hours ago [-]
It’s purely political.

“… fix the broken systems left to us by the Biden administration.…”

grues-dinner 2 hours ago [-]
> A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision.

It was true in 1979, it's true today.

Blaming "coding" for this is an explicit admission that someone is shirking their accountability.

e40 48 minutes ago [-]
These people are shameless and will lie at the drop of a hat to get out from under any responsibility.
wnevets 3 hours ago [-]
If a coding error can ruin people's lives like this than you're doing it wrong
avs733 3 hours ago [-]
The quotation marks in this article are under a heavy load.

Blaming people you just fired for a mistake you made firing people is as timeless as it is pathetic.

bandrami 3 hours ago [-]
I stg DOGE is going to rewrite the Social Security software stack and it's going to crash and burn on the first person whose last name is "Null"
goopthink 2 hours ago [-]
To be fair, this is already a very real and annoying problem for unfortunately named folks, predating any DOGE work: https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/null-last-name-computer-scient...
kurthr 3 hours ago [-]
Oh, little Bobby Tables. Such a trickster.
shakna 2 hours ago [-]
They're going to try and rewrite the IRS' Individual Master File, and not care if it changes the way it behaves.
adrianmonk 1 hours ago [-]
Isn't that what the IRS has already been doing the last few years, and has been making good progress on, except that they have been doing it properly so it behaves right?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewleahey/2024/09/06/from-co...

It seems more than a little silly to try to rewrite something when it isn't necessary since it has already been done. And that goes double if the goal is efficiency since it cost money to do something that doesn't need to be done.

euroderf 2 hours ago [-]
As I understand it, the source for the Master File is lost to the mists of time. But a SoA A.I. can disassemble and comment it, yes ? Prep it for recompilation ?
ineedasername 3 hours ago [-]
Yep, the ‘ol ”my finger slipped and I accidentally pushed ‘select * from table;’ instead of a complex and thoughtful set of filters”

That type. It happens, we’ve all been there

intelVISA 53 minutes ago [-]
I doubt the outcome would've been much different had they used their complex and thoughtful set of filters (sys.rand)
robertoandred 3 hours ago [-]
Sounds super efficient.
hn_throwaway_99 2 hours ago [-]
> The spokesperson added: “This is exactly why HHS is reorganizing its administrative functions to streamline operations and fix the broken systems left to us by the Biden administration.

On previous software teams where I've worked, we had a joke that "You get to blame the guy who left for one month." That is you can do this type of complaining, "Oh man, this codebase is spaghetti, screw Bill who just left", for a month. But after a month, you no longer got to blame the guy who left - at that point, it was on you.

We said it (somewhat) tongue in cheek, but there was a real message that, at some point, it doesn't really matter what the guy before you did - we've all dealt with legacy, shitty codebases, but at some point you need to own it.

I realize taking any sort of responsibility for something that goes wrong is anathema to the current administration, but I think the "it's Biden's fault" excuse is going to start wearing really thin, even for Trump supporters if/when the economic shit show starts to affect them.

helsinkiandrew 4 hours ago [-]
> “Even if they stopped now, a lot of damage has been done,” another NINDS investigator says. “I think it’s a sinking ship. I don’t mean my lab, I mean biomedical research.”
throwawaymaths 3 hours ago [-]
It already was, though. We lost about 2 decades of alzheimer's research and probably about 30 drug candidates, and that's just one subfield.
tandr 31 minutes ago [-]
Will we ever remember that?...
Larrikin 3 hours ago [-]
So what is your point?
MengerSponge 4 hours ago [-]
“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.” ― F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby
JoshTko 3 hours ago [-]
"These are not serious people"
pmags 5 hours ago [-]
https://archive.is/RkCst

Color me dubious about "coding errors" when Musk and his lap DOGE-ies are involved.

jillyboel 4 hours ago [-]
Even though I wouldn't be surprised at all about the fact that anything Musk and his cronies put out is chock full of coding errors, it does seem like it's just a pathetically weak excuse.
giantrobot 3 hours ago [-]
Hey don't worry, they're going to rewrite all the SSA software next!
jmyeet 1 hours ago [-]
Cruely and revenge upon one's perceived ideological foes are the core organizing principles of this administration. This is a purge, similar to that of Jews of the Germany in the 1930s. The NIH in particular and civil servants in general are just one facet of this. The purge of academic ranks is another (eg [1]).

What makes this possible is hyper-individualism, decades (if not centuries) of attack on any sort of collectivism and the fomented division of ordinary people based on race, class, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender or religion. I'm reminded of this LBJ quote:

    “If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.”
It echoes fears of the former slave-owning class in Reconstruction that poor white people would unify with freed slaves.

It's wild to me that we're reliving Nazi Germany less than a century later while victims of the Nazi regime, direct first-hand witnesses, are still alive.

[1]: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/3/29/harvard-cmes-di...

3 hours ago [-]
pestatije 5 hours ago [-]
hopefully they found a new job already
xyst 3 hours ago [-]
It’s wild how America is just complacent with the destruction of the federal government.

We see all of these red flags across the agencies yet there’s minimal uproar.

I have seen a few protests (50501, recently) but nothing that stops this wanton destruction.

- $6.6T sell off in market due to Orange administration trade war in just _2 days_

- USAID decimated

- US trade partners lost

- Federal agency head count losses across critical departments such as the DOJ

- Weaponized incompetence at the DoD under the Hegseth “leadership” with Signalgate being the latest blunder

- An unelected, billionaire Musk, with his supposed limited “special government employee” access and DOGE have been cutting public programs left and right. Public programs meant to be our safety nets

- Department of Education being undermined by putting incompetent leadership at the top position (a _professional wrestling promoter_) and cutting funding to critical programs for public schools. This is also purportedly to be “abolished”

- Then we have a non-medical professional, and health misinformation promoter at the head of HHS. The awful leadership during the measles outbreaks explains itself…

Wonder if this is what it was like in the months preceding the _2008 subprime mortage crisis_

Definitely not excited for this recession induced by absolute stupidity.

[1] https://www.wsj.com/finance/stocks/u-s-stock-futures-fall-fu...

hattmall 2 hours ago [-]
For most people, particularly those who don't work in government. The federal government represents problems, aggravation, frustration and general resentment. Practically no one walks away from interactions with the federal government with a positive feeling.

Dealing with the bureaucracy is generally awful. Most of the time you will go through several employees over the course of hours/days/weeks or even years and you wonder how they manage to get dressed each day. Eventually you get someone who solves your problem in about 20 seconds.

I don't know if you have ever dealt with the TSA in any meaningful capacity but they are by far the most competent government agency that interacts with the public.

I've worked with law enforcement dealing with computer forensics and our state investigators are reasonably competent. We have had to deal with people in federal agencies and it's mind boggling. I'm talking like a PDF emailed of html source code for a login page with the subject "Run this in power shell". That's coming in on a Friday at 4:55 when we have been waiting for a week and they don't respond back until Wednesday with a reply like "team is checking this out".

Eventually someone will mail you a DVD of a screen recording of them logging into a system that's running on a local IP and then 12 minutes of explaining boolean operators.

wredcoll 2 hours ago [-]
I mean, I feel like you might be aware of this, but what you're describing is literally PR and propaganda.

Many millions of people get social security/etc payments every month from the federal government, but of course that doesn't count. "Keep the gov out of my medicare!" anyone?

People have a real short memory and nobody appreciates the lack of mercury and arsenic in their sausages today, it's all about "what are you going to do tomorrow?"

I'm probably not cruel enough to do it but I wish every person who spoke like you just did would have to live a month or whatever without all of the benefits of the government.

hattmall 44 minutes ago [-]
I'm speaking to the experience of dealing with the government. It's not propaganda, this is literally what happens. Everyone independently coming to the same conclusion based on their personal experience isn't propaganda. It's reality.

Have you ever tried to deal with the government. I have unfortunately had a lot of dealing with Social security, medicare, medicaid, etc. From having to deal with aging parents. Yes, perhaps once you have gone through the extreme myriad of hoops to get everything set up and your check is automatically coming then yes it's ok. But you better hope no one gets some piece of PII and files something that throws it off.

>I'm probably not cruel enough to do it but I wish every person who spoke like you just did would have to live a month or whatever without all of the benefits of the government.

This is a horrible authoritarian justification. People shouldn't be made to starve so they can appreciate the gruel they are given versus having nothing. We should have a functional, efficient, and pleasant government that isn't adversarial to the general population.

Do you have any idea how long it can take to get a Medicare / SSI disability claim approved?

It was two years for my family member and that's with a very legitimate non-controversial terminal diagnosis. She finally got approved about 3 months before she was on Hospice. And this is someone with reasonable resources and active family members advocating for her. I can't imagine what it's like for low income people without resources or education.

That's not just me though, here's a reddit thread of lots of other people with similar or worse experiences, ( and some better).

https://www.reddit.com/r/SocialSecurity/comments/1c0e8uk/how...

The fact of the matter is the majority of people don't have positive experiences when dealing with the government. I'm not even sure who is supposed to be pushing this propaganda. I would love for it to be the other way around and the government provides clear value in a helpful way, but that is simply not what people experience.

And that's not even getting into what it's like when you start getting copious amounts of automated nonsensical threatening form letters from the IRS.

thomasfromcdnjs 2 hours ago [-]
Baha
dualityoftapirs 3 hours ago [-]
About 160 million people either actively voted for this or couldn't be bothered to vote so ostensibly think this is ok. This is what the vast majority wants.
2 hours ago [-]
stepanhruda 2 hours ago [-]
The only way we can do something is if these actions become deeply unpopular - which they currently aren’t, still about 43% of the population are totally onboard.

All we can do is wait for the empire to tumble enough until people without empathy become personally affected and turn sour. My guess is it won’t take the full 4 years.

bee_rider 45 minutes ago [-]
There were some pretty big protests Saturday. But, realistically, we aren’t going to have the sort of protests that, like, overthrow governments in the US. We tend to have rallies and marches rather than riots and rebellions. These are really

1) exercise in venting/speaking out/awareness raising

2) networking events for activists.

Eventually the activists and movements aim to get votes in the next election. Get funding for the opposition party’s legal fights and campaigns. That sort of thing.

So, for the most part it’ll be the Trump & Friends show until the midterms at least. It isn’t complacency I think, I mean the opportunity to pick an alternative happened in the past. Is it complacency to live in the outcomes of what has already happened?

kurthr 3 hours ago [-]
Don't forget Monday futures are limit down.

   NASDAQ
   Fri Close  Mon Open    Change
   18,656.47  16,746.00  -1,910.47
   https://www.cnbc.com/pre-markets/
You can hope for a relief rally Tuesday after they hit the circuit breakers.
jmcgough 2 hours ago [-]
We will never recover from the damage they are doing, at least not in our lifetimes. It is so much easier to destroy than to create, and so many of the services and research performed by the NIH and CDC are truly irreplaceable.

The top cause of death among US children is drowning, and the CDC is the only national group studying and giving prevention training to at risk kids, particularly states with high drowning deaths like Florida. That entire team is gone now, along with many others.

whoisthemachine 2 hours ago [-]
In regards to Federal agencies, a lot of it comes down to many people just not knowing much about these agencies, and much of what they do know are the scary bits and pieces capitalists have broadcast through their media (I hesitate to just call them conservatives, as their agenda is completely separate from moving law and government in a slow, conservative manner).

I for one didn't even know we had an agency like USAID, which sounds like it has done wonderful work around the world. Most people (again, myself included), probably don't know just what the DOE's main function is. Turns out it's a pretty hands-off agency, and shutting it down will mostly just harm kids with disabilities. Why we shut these agencies down is beyond me, but I guess it makes them look like they're doing something without going after the actual big fish, like our national "defense" apparatus. Oh no, there we're going to build a "golden dome". A very "efficient" one I'm sure.

freeone3000 2 hours ago [-]
> Wonder if this is what it was like in the months preceding the _2008 subprime mortage crisis_

No, that was mostly people just living their lives with a few standard shows about "housing prices are high again and people are worried" followed by months of "houses are worth nothing now and lots of people cannot pay their mortgages and cannot refinance" and then a few years of "this was a 100% illegal eviction notice, did you even check or just assume none of your customers paid?"

Nothing at all like what's currently going on in the US federal government right now.

brigandish 3 hours ago [-]
> Wonder if this is what it was like in the months preceding the _2008 subprime mortage crisis_

Some people were warning about possible problems in the markets, but no, in general the media were chugging along as normal, they're most excitable when they're either against the ruling force or there's blood in the water. This reminds me of 2016-2020.

fwip 3 hours ago [-]
What kind of protest do you imagine could stop Trump from being Trump? His own staff tried that for four years (2016-2020) and made next to no progress.

Now he's surrounded himself with enablers, and the Dems won't even make a real effort to oppose the stuff he's doing.

kurthr 3 hours ago [-]
He'd love to call in the National Guard and gun down a few hundred "terrorists". Send a few thousand more of them to El Salvador and MAGA will celebrate.
duped 2 hours ago [-]
The kind where he is forced to leave office and/or the country.

Like sedition is a crime still so I'm not going to advocate for the downfall of the US government, but if you're asking "what kind of protest can stop Trump" then there are dozens of examples over the last twenty years to look at for "protests that result in the head of state no longer being the head of state."

We're just not there, yet.

shadowgovt 1 hours ago [-]
The revolution will not be planned on Hacker News.
racedude 2 hours ago [-]
well said.
black_13 2 hours ago [-]
[dead]
SV_BubbleTime 4 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
steele 2 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
etchalon 4 hours ago [-]
So we're firing people with PHP now?
freeone3000 2 hours ago [-]
ChatGPT
vFunct 3 hours ago [-]
Likely TCL
m0llusk 2 hours ago [-]
Seems like it might be more efficient with WebAssembly.
etchalon 2 hours ago [-]
Can't wait for the Rust rewrite.
somenameforme 49 minutes ago [-]
Do people just want to rage? Because a lot of what is being said here, and even the article's headline are not supported by what the article says. In particular:

- The workers were never fired. They were put on paid leave.

- They were fully reinstated less than 24 hours after it became clear a mistake had been made.

- The headline is also misleading. The reason for the firing was 'based on administrative codes that “may not have been intentional.”' So it was a "coding" error in the sense of administrative codes, not programming.

The way people are responding to this, and then hyperbolizing each other, just looks like mob mentality. I'm certain this will be downvoted for the exact same reason. People don't want facts.

cptroot 46 minutes ago [-]
For what it's worth, if you get put on a RIF plan then you treat it like a firing. Them being on paid leave isn't them not being fired yet, it's severance.
rexpop 22 minutes ago [-]
If only were an isolated incident, and not the latest in a long train of abuses and usurpations.
somenameforme 15 minutes ago [-]
Except it's the same in literally all of these articles. Some relatively minor mistake is taken and blown up into some huge degree of maliciousness or unprecedented incompetence. People then 'social mediaize' it all by taking it at face value, and then getting each other even more riled up - exactly like a mob.

It's easy to see where this is coming from because each writer of these sort of articles likely had colleagues and/or friends who were intentionally terminated, and so they're writing with a tremendous chip on their shoulder. But they're doing a disservice to themselves because anybody who is not particularly upset by these changes is going to completely eyeroll each time another one of these articles appears, and those who are genuinely upset are increasingly living in a world detached from reality.

The end result is of course conflict and confrontation, which I suppose is the point. But I don't think this is something anybody would have ever wanted if we imagine how things might look in hindsight, before we get there.

stonogo 17 minutes ago [-]
You're not getting downvoted because "people don't want facts" but because your list is misleadingly incomplete or, in some instances, wrong.

- The workers were put on paid leave pending termination, for procedural reasons (they could not legally be fired immediately).

- Only ten were reinstated, and nobody knows why. The agency that reinstated them (NINDS) is not the same agency that issued the firing (HHS directly)

- The staff in question were explicitly told a "computer error" (quotes as such in the article) led to their termination notices.

This is not how a functioning management system works. It's also not an effective way to operate a government research program. There's no hyperbole here; it's just bad work.

somenameforme 2 minutes ago [-]
Look at the comments in this post. People think they were fired, because that's what the article claims. You have people in the top post of this thread social mediaizing each other about how now they'll get to renegotiate their contracts and all this nonsense. Except none of this is true. Similarly, look at how everybody is interpreting "coding error." As the editor certainly intended, everybody is just assuming it means programming, and just jumping off the deep end from there.

Everything I have said would lead a person reading it to understand the facts with near to complete accuracy (I do agree I should have added that they were put on paid leave pending dismissal). Yet in this thread people are discussing the article with basically 0% accuracy, so far as the facts are concerned.

1 hours ago [-]
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 06:00:16 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.